Re: How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable from Boris Zbarsky on 2013-09-26 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2013)

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:00:08 -0400
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <52447628.1010105@mit.edu>

On 9/26/13 1:45 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>  Could we just have readonly<Foo> to mean
> "Foo, but all of its attributes no-op on set"?

It _really_ depends on the behavior you want.

This is a situation where Domenic is right, I think: once you start 
introducing new WebIDL features, you should really write out in detail 
how this would work on the ES level so we all know what you actually mean.

-Boris

Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 18:00:42 UTC