W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:00:08 -0400
Message-ID: <52447628.1010105@mit.edu>
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
On 9/26/13 1:45 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>  Could we just have readonly<Foo> to mean
> "Foo, but all of its attributes no-op on set"?

It _really_ depends on the behavior you want.

This is a situation where Domenic is right, I think: once you start 
introducing new WebIDL features, you should really write out in detail 
how this would work on the ES level so we all know what you actually mean.

Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 18:00:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:18 UTC