- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:46:22 -0400
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > Ah, OK. It's not quite the same since they use [NoInterfaceObject] and > implements, whereas DOMRect and DOMRectReadOnly would presumably be normal > interfaces. Why are these prefixed with DOM? Also, if they still have the same restrictions as to what they represent as before, giving them a less specific name seems bad. Or is the intent to make them represent any rectangle? -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2013 13:46:49 UTC