Re: [webidl] Spec for callback interface interface objects is self-contradictory in places from Boris Zbarsky on 2013-08-02 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2013)

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 07:26:32 -0400
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
CC: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <51FB9768.9040003@mit.edu>

On 8/1/13 11:40 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.651;r2=1.652;f=h

Why should constants on an inherited interface force the existence of an 
interface object for the inherited callback interface?

-Boris

Received on Friday, 2 August 2013 11:27:03 UTC