- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:49:18 +1000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Cameron McCormack wrote: > OK. I propose then that we allow [Unforgeable] on the interface, which > means: > > * attributes get own, non-configurable accessor properties (with setters > if they are not readonly attributes), and no property on the prototype > * operations get own, non-configurable, non-writable properties, and no > property on the prototype > * the stringifier gets an own, non-configurable, non-writable toString > property, and no property on the prototype > * there is an own, non-configurable, non-writable valueOf property that > just returns this > > I think that's the least amount of crazy. I've done this now: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.632;r2=1.633;f=h http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/v1.xml.diff?r1=1.80;r2=1.81;f=h
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 06:55:25 UTC