- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:17:32 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23369 --- Comment #5 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- For what it's worth, SpiderMonkey internally uses ArrayBufferView to mean "any typed array or DataView" (which is what ArrayBufferView actually used to mean). Basically anything with a .buffer on it. That's more or less what your ByteSequence ends up being, modulo the ArrayBuffer bit, but I think the ArrayBufferView terminology actually makes sense for "any object which provides a view of an ArrayBuffer". I would be fine with having ArrayBufferView as a primitive IDL type defined as above, to simplify things for spec authors, even though it's not an interface type... The only problem is defining distinguishability: typed array types are distinguishable from each other and from DataView, but ArrayBufferView is not distinguishable from typed array types and DataView). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 18:17:34 UTC