On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Domenic Denicola < domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: > Robert, I am confused what purpose the inheritance serves in your > proposal. The purpose of inheritance in JS is usually to allow you to apply > superclass methods (or in this case, accessor) to the base class. You don't mean "base class" here, do you? Normally "base class" means the same thing as superclass. > But that does not work if your model is to *remove* permissions in the > subclass; it would mean you could use the superclass's setter to mutate the > supposedly-immutable subclass. My proposal doesn't do that. Client code has no permission to mutate state via DOMRect. I am trying to understand what benefit this inheritance hierarchy has over > a non-hierarchy, and simply can't see one. > We can put functionality common to mutable and immutable rects in DOMRect. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Friday, 27 September 2013 22:23:56 UTC