RE: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again from Domenic Denicola on 2013-08-07 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2013)

From: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 17:21:56 +0000
To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B4AE8F4E86E26C47AC407D49872F6F9F878A76C3@BY2PRD0510MB354.namprd05.prod.outlook.>

Thanks Travis, for some reason I seem to have confused myself about `Element.prototype instanceof Element` over the course of this thread.

The duck-typing approach seems neat, but note that `Element.prototype` has a `querySelector` method that just throws, saying things like "TypeError: value does not implement interface Element."

Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 17:23:16 UTC