Re: [WebIDL] Callback functions and callback interfaces should allow optional arguments sanely

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:02:55 -0400
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <51EE8D0F.4020401@mit.edu>

On 7/23/13 3:33 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.645;r2=1.646;f=h

Looks good.  Should we have something similar for operations on callback 
interfaces?

-Boris

Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 14:03:30 UTC