- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:02:29 +0200
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-script-coord@w3.org
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 00:08:35 +0200, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Robert O'Callahan > <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > >> -- DOMRect is the base interface for both immutable and mutable rects. >> It >> defines "current x/y/width/height" state and can expose methods that use >> that state. Other APIs can take DOMRects and be defined in terms of the >> current state. It allows read-only access to the current state and does >> not >> offer any mutation APIs. >> -- DOMRectImmutable extends DOMRect and adds the invariant that the >> state >> never changes. It probably doesn't need to add any new API. (However, >> being >> immutable is potentially meaningful to clients, because it allows them >> to >> avoid copying, so testing whether a rect is immutable could have value.) >> -- DOMRectMutable extends DOMRect and adds APIs to mutate the rect. >> > > BTW if we take this approach then a "live rect" that's not immutable but > can't be changed by the client is exactly DOMRect. Do we need to differentiate between live/read-only and immutable at all? -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Monday, 30 September 2013 15:03:02 UTC