- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:03:25 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22320 --- Comment #14 from Mark S. Miller <erights@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #13) > For > example, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi prevented SpiderMonkey Should be https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724768 > from being considered SES-safe for a very long time. The workaround at > https://code.google.com/p/google-caja/source/browse/trunk/src/com/google/ > caja/ses/repairES5.js#3127 was only possible once we knew the worst case > list of possible missing properties. It doesn't sound like even this > workaround would be possible in this case. > > There are a lot more users than implementors, and the complexity of > implementing getOwnProperties correctly is not unreasonable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 14:03:27 UTC