W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2013

Should ByteString be a serializable type?

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 11:01:36 -0700
Message-ID: <51F55C80.9050100@mit.edu>
To: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>

DOMString is a serializable type, but ByteString doesn't seem to be. 
Should it be?

-Boris

Received on Sunday, 28 July 2013 18:02:08 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org: "[Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new"
Previous message: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org: "[Bug 22806] Why special case Date and RegExp in #es-sequence"
Next in thread: Norbert Lindenberg: "Re: Should ByteString be a serializable type?"
Reply: Norbert Lindenberg: "Re: Should ByteString be a serializable type?"
Reply: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: Should ByteString be a serializable type?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:17 UTC