- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:58:21 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
[tangent!] On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: >> Ah, OK. It's not quite the same since they use [NoInterfaceObject] and >> implements, whereas DOMRect and DOMRectReadOnly would presumably be normal >> interfaces. > > Why are these prefixed with DOM? They needed *some* common prefix to avoid clashing with userland code, and DOM seemed to be a decent one that covered roughly what all they'd be used for. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2013 14:59:07 UTC