Re: What should happen when [Unforgeable] is used on a consequential interface of an ancestor?

Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Right; it didn't at the point when the mail you're responding to was sent.

Ah. ;)

> I agree that there is no difference between this case and the case when
> "c" is on a consequential interface of B. I just want the spec to treat
> them identically. Which at this point, I think it does (but did not when
> the mail you're responding to was sent).

OK, thanks.  More [Unforgeable] changes (to handle it on interfaces) 
coming soon.