W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Promises "if not omitted" language

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:39:55 -0400
Message-ID: <51ED605B.8030907@mit.edu>
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
On 7/22/13 12:14 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
> FWIW I think there are two coherent choices here: `undefined`/function only, or anything allowed, with non-functions triggering the default behavior.

There's a third choice: undefined and both null trigger default 
behavior, functions get called, anything else is disallowed.

Or is that what you mean by the "antipattern that DOM specs in 
particular have perpetuated"?

Received on Monday, 22 July 2013 16:40:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:17 UTC