Re: Forbid constants on [noInterfaceObject] interfaces

On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 at 5:43 PM, David Bruant wrote:

> given how they promote the feature [1] (see code snippets in the article, it has both "PERSISTENT" and window.TEMPORARY), I doubt this is a bug. Worse, I doubt this can be changed.


FWIW, I don't think forbidding constants on [noInterfaceObject] interfaces would have made any difference here. There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of WebIDL. 

-- 
Marcos Caceres

Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 17:13:04 UTC