- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 18:12:32 +0100
- To: David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 at 5:43 PM, David Bruant wrote: > given how they promote the feature [1] (see code snippets in the article, it has both "PERSISTENT" and window.TEMPORARY), I doubt this is a bug. Worse, I doubt this can be changed. FWIW, I don't think forbidding constants on [noInterfaceObject] interfaces would have made any difference here. There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of WebIDL. -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 17:13:04 UTC