- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 01:07:14 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22156 --- Comment #5 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Trailing commas for enums were allowed in the other bug, but I'm not doing > > it for extended attributes unless there is more demand. > > It's pretty bizarre if a language allows trailing commas in *some* > comma-separated syntax constructs, but not others. Not unheard of that only some comma-separated syntax constructs in a language allow a trailing comma. In JS [1,2,] is fine yet function(a,b,){} isn't. *shrug* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 01:07:15 UTC