W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again

From: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 13:53:19 -0700
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-Id: <37ABE9A2-A047-4510-AF11-406C0B68861C@wirfs-brock.com>
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>

On Aug 7, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
> <allen@wirfs-brock.com> wrote:
>> ...
>> Actually, for ES6 it's looking like WeakArray is going to be your best bet for cases where such tests where the branding really needs to be unforgeable.
> Do you mean WeakSet, or is there some WeakArray object that's going to
> be added later?  (I guess an ordered WeakSet, more or less?

Oops, I meant WeakMap/WeakSet depending on whether you need to make some sort of value association.

Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 20:53:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:17 UTC