Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again from Boris Zbarsky on 2013-07-20 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2013)

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 08:26:04 -0400
To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <51EA81DC.2030205@mit.edu>

On 7/20/13 1:36 AM, Travis Leithead wrote:
> Well, we can start grass-roots-style with DOM4/5

That might be the way to go, yeah...  Then perhaps an IDL annotation 
that lets an interface opt in to having an isFoo?

-Boris

Received on Saturday, 20 July 2013 12:26:33 UTC