- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:16:04 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22320 --- Comment #18 from Mark S. Miller <erights@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #17) > > the ES specs do not specify any particular order for this. > > One of the goals of the current web specs is to not have undefined behavior. > That means they do in fact specify an order here. Other things being equal, removing undefined behavior from specs is a great thing. I've fought for this many times in tc39 as well. However, breaking a feature because 1) the feature itself could be provided cheaply, in a way that conforms to the es spec, at the price of non-deterministic order. 2) the defined order, which no one really cares about for this feature, would for some reason be expensive. Btw, why would a deterministic order for this be expensive? I don't get it. > Again, if the spec changes such that it's sane to implement, it'll perhaps > get implemented (I obviously can't speak for WebKit or Blink, but we would > implement in Gecko). If it does not, it probably won't be (as now). So how about we change the spec to "have getOwnPropertyNames return a list of the own property names"? What is the right forum to get this spec changed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 17:16:05 UTC