On Aug 10, 2013 1:03 PM, "Brendan Eich" <brendan@secure.meer.net> wrote: > Extensible Web Manifesto does *not* mean standardizing only block devices and reinvinting filesystems (poorly) in JS libraries on top! > > Does anyone disagree? I definitely agree. I was overly accepting when saying that "I'm OK with [block level APIs]". What I meant to say is that I'm OK with exploring that. But I don't think the result would make authors happy. > But first let's agree that move is not compound, composite, or sugar. I agree move() definitely needs to stay. I think the other ones I listed in the open questions section should be debated. That was why I started this thread. I'm also very interested to hear from Allen why he thinks that this API couldn't be used across other ES environments. If we can fix it that would be great. As long as the API remains good for the web. / Jonas
Received on Saturday, 10 August 2013 21:16:29 UTC