Friday, 30 June 2006
Thursday, 29 June 2006
Wednesday, 28 June 2006
- Re: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR -- motivates links
- Re: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR -- motivates links
- Re: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR -- motivates links
- RE: new editor's draft
- Re: new editor's draft
- RE: new editor's draft
- RE: [UCR] The Use Case previously known as publication
- Re: [UCR] The Use Case previously known as publication
- new editor's draft
- RIF] Draft of minutes from June 27th telecon
- Re: Editor's Draft of UCR (more or less) ready
- Re: [UCR] The Use Case previously known as publication
- Re: [UCR] The Use Case previously known as publication
- Re: My UCR action on merging two CSFs
- Re: My UCR action on merging two CSFs
- Re: My UCR action on merging two CSFs
- ALPSWS workshop at ICLP, August 16th, call for participation
- My UCR action on merging two CSFs
- RE: Clarifying paragraph regarding RIFRAF at beginning of requirements section
Tuesday, 27 June 2006
- Re: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR -- motivates links
- Re: [UCR] The Use Case previously known as publication
- My UCR Action From Today's Telecon
- Re: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR -- motivates links
- RE: Clarifying paragraph regarding RIFRAF at beginning of requirements section
- Clarifying paragraph regarding RIFRAF at beginning of requirements section
- [UCR] Diagram issues
- RE: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR -- motivates links
- My UCR actions from today's call
- RE: Editor's Draft of UCR (more or less) ready
- Re: Editor's Draft of UCR (more or less) ready
- Re: Editor's Draft of UCR (more or less) ready
- Re: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR
- RE: Editor's Draft of UCR (more or less) ready
- RE: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR
- RE: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR
- Re: Editor's Draft of UCR (more or less) ready
- RE: [UCR] The Use Case previously known as publication
- Re: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR
- [UCR] The Use Case previously known as publication
Monday, 26 June 2006
- Re: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR
- Re: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR
- RE: comments on Editor's Draft of UCR
- comments on Editor's Draft of UCR
- Editor's Draft of UCR (more or less) ready
- Small example of SPARQL wrapping in Prova
- Revised Minutes telecon 20th June 2006
- [UCR] alternative publication use case
Friday, 23 June 2006
- [ALL] Process for accepting next UCR WD
- [Admin] Draft minutes from f2f3 June 9 session 4
- [Admin] Draft minutes from f2f3 June 9 Session 3
- [Admin] Draft minutes from f2f3 June 9 Session 5-6
- [Admin] Draft minute from f2f3 9 June Session 2
- Re: [RIF] Agenda for telecon June 27
- RE: Draft minutes of telecon 20th June 2006
- Re: Draft minutes of telecon 20th June 2006
- Re: Draft minutes of telecon 20th June 2006
- Draft minutes of telecon 20th June 2006
Thursday, 22 June 2006
- [RIF] Agenda for telecon June 27
- [Admin] Draft minutes F2F3 8 June session 2
- [Admin] Draft minutes from F2F3 June 8 session 1
- [Admin] Draft minutes from f2f3 June 9 session 1
- Re: Input to UCR from Charter
- Re: Input to UCR from Charter
- Re: Input to UCR from Charter
- Input to UCR from Charter
- Re: Common Logic Final Draft Int'l Standard posted
Wednesday, 21 June 2006
- RE: proposed UCR outline
- Re: Common Logic Final Draft Int'l Standard posted
- RE: Common Logic Final Draft Int'l Standard posted
- Common Logic Final Draft Int'l Standard posted
- RE: proposed UCR outline
- Re: [UCR] Draft update for use case 8: Vocabulary Mapping for Data Integration
Tuesday, 20 June 2006
- RE: [UCR] Draft update for use case 8: Vocabulary Mapping for Data Integration
- [Fwd: Meeting Network Guidelines]
Monday, 19 June 2006
Friday, 16 June 2006
Wednesday, 14 June 2006
Tuesday, 13 June 2006
- RE: no real RIF-WG meeting today
- no real RIF-WG meeting today
- Apologies: corrected link
- New industrial use case published: Rule-based User Notification framework
Monday, 12 June 2006
Sunday, 11 June 2006
Saturday, 10 June 2006
- Re: proposed UCR outline
- Re: proposed UCR outline
- proposed UCR outline
- chair's projected slides from F2F3
- Re: clarification requested on Requirement 5 in new WD-DC
Friday, 9 June 2006
- clarification requested on Requirement 5 in new WD-DC
- RIFRAF Description of rule systems and relation to SAWSDL
- proposed definition of covers
- Re: requirements slides
- Re: requirements slides
- RE: requirements slides
- requirements slides
- [UCR] Proposed clarification of using OWL KBs as data
- Re: Requirement: RIF rules should be able to call out to external query processors
- Re: Requirement: RIF rules should be able to call out to external query processors
- Re: Requirement: RIF rules should be able to call out to external query processors
- Re: Draft prooosed 4th goal: RIF should be usable as the basis for a semantic web rule language
- Requirement: RIF rules should be able to call out to external query processors
Thursday, 8 June 2006
- Re: Draft prooosed 4th goal: RIF should be usable as the basis for a semantic web rule language
- Draft prooosed 4th goal: RIF should be usable as the basis for a semantic web rule language
- Re: about "strong" negation
- about "strong" negation
- RIF: Outline of a Betfair use case
- Corrected Betfair IT head count
- W3C F2F3: OMG PRR presentation (for comment or interest)
- Outline of a Betfair use case
- Telecon info for f2f
- f2f3 seating diagram
Wednesday, 7 June 2006
Tuesday, 6 June 2006
- Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1
- Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1
- Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1
- Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1
- Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1
- Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1
- Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1
- Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1
- Re: "industry needs"
- [RIF] Detailled agenda F2F3 8-9 June, Budva
- RE: "industry needs"
- RE: "industry needs"
- RE: "industry needs"
- Re: "industry needs"
- Re: RIF: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules --> rule priorities
- RE: "industry needs"
- RE: RIF: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules --> data sources
- RIF: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules --> rule priorities
- [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: RE: [Fwd: Re: Transportation between airports and hotels in Budva]]]
- RE: "industry needs"
- [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: RE: [Fwd: Re: Transportation between airports and hotels in Budva]]]
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- RE: "industry needs"
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- Re: RIF: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- "industry needs"
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
Saturday, 3 June 2006
Friday, 2 June 2006
- RE: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- RIF: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- UCR take 2
- RE: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- RE: Betfair position on Production and Event-Condition-Action Rules
- Re: Betfair position on Production and Event-Condition-Action Rules
- [RIF] Mapping of DVL and WRL into condition language of extensible design
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- RE: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- Betfair position on Production and Event-Condition-Action Rules
- Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- Re: Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- Re: RIF: Production and Event-Condition-Action Rules
- Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- Fitting PR and RR into logical rules
- Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- Re: RIF: Production and Event-Condition-Action Rules
- RE: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- RIF: Production and Event-Condition-Action Rules
- RE: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
Thursday, 1 June 2006
- Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements and first-order logic
- Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements and first-order logic
- Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- Re: RIF WG TeleCon Meeting Minutes -- 30 May 2006
- RIF WG TeleCon Meeting Minutes -- 30 May 2006
- RE: can we all work together?
- Re: can we all work together?
- Re: RIF: can we all work together?
- Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- RE: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR
- RIF: can we all work together?
- Semantics 2006 - Extended Deadline
- Re: can we all work together?
- can we all work together?