- From: Paula-Lavinia Patranjan <paula.patranjan@ifi.lmu.de>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:59:53 +0200
- To: ewallace@cme.nist.gov
- CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Hi, The requirement on supporting UML instances as data is in the current version of the Design Constraints text [1] under 'Design Constraints that need more discussion' because we were not sure how to interpret this requirement on RIF. This requirement was originally proposed by Donald Chapin, John Hall, and Ed Barkmeyer under the 'Consistency with major market technologies' [2]. We decided at the F2F3 to keep this for further discussion since we needed clarification on the requirement and its champions were not at the meeting. Regards, Paula [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/WD-DC [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Consistency_with_major_market_technologies ewallace@cme.nist.gov schrieb: >Hello, > >I have some questions regarding requirement 5 in the latest Wiki entry >for Design Constraints [1]. It reads, "RIF should accept UML >instances as data". UML instances is a bit ambiguous as it is not >entirely clear which metalevel you mean. I believe that you really >mean instances of a UML model (or Objects in UML parlance), but as >written I would be inclined to read it as instances of the UML >metamodel (aka models). If this is what you mean then please >change the requirement to read:"RIF should accept UML model >instances as data", to disambiguate. > >Assuming that you mean objects, then in how and in what form do you >expect to encounter these objects: through some oracle to a UML or MOF >repository as in 2.2.4, as serialized data in XMI form, through some >JAVA or other mapping to UML, or through something else? > >Also, what is the genesis of this requirement? Did it fall out of >PRR compatibility? I don't object to it. I just somehow missed its >introduction into the list. > >Sorry if any or all of this was covered in the FTF yesterday. I >was on the line for that, but couldn't really hear the discussion >well. > >-Evan > >Evan K. Wallace >Manufacturing Systems Integration Division > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/WD-DC > > > >
Received on Saturday, 10 June 2006 12:59:57 UTC