- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@urjc.es>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 10:48:12 +0200
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
Dave Reynolds wrote: > > Francis McCabe wrote: > >> This requirement is already captured: it is part of the oracular >> models requirement. > > Agreed. > > The f2f discussion didn't like the term "oracular" as having other > connotations. Then later on the case of SQL was raised in addition to > SPARQL and then there's the issue of this being *one* way of coupling to > a DL reasoner. BTW: A particular way to integrate with DL reasoners in such a way and a general extension to semantically include external reasoners with rules will be introduced in our tutorial on sunday... http://www.eswc2006.org/tutorials.html#tutorial1 for all who are still in budva and have time. best, axel > For reasons that escaped me I ended up with the action to try to capture > that discussion. I think it is intended to clarify the scope and nature > of the requirement. I may not have succeeded in that aim. > > Dave > > > > -- Dr. Axel Polleres email: axel@polleres.net url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 08:48:39 UTC