- From: Alex Kozlenkov <alex.kozlenkov@betfair.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:03:39 +0100
- To: <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
To clarify our view on PR/RR interoperability with DR, we certainly have usage patterns where information integration occurs right in the middle of a decision making process that is thus both dynamic and based on reasoning. The main scenario here is that something significant is happening in the enterprise or the world. How do we react to this may only be decided based on push/pull based protocols involving machines and humans, but each step of the response also relies on precise logical reasoning about the suitable course of actions. Alex > -----Original Message----- > From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Francois Bry > Sent: 02 June 2006 12:55 > To: public-rif-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR > > > Sandro Hawke wrote: > >> I would suggest to go for a RIF encompassing three kinds of rule > >> (deduction rules, normative rules, and productiuon/ECA rules) and *not* > >> consider an interchange between rulesets of the different kinds. > >> > > > > Which kind of rule should be used for Business Rule applications? Which > > kind should businesses adopt, if they want to adopt rules technology? > > > > > > > > This is a good question. Business rule applications require all three > kinds of rules -- for different purposes. This is well understandable by > looking at the well-known business rule use case "EU-Rent" (cf. Googel > ---> Eu-Rent). > > Francois > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair use SkyScan from > MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses. > > ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 12:10:26 UTC