RE: Draft minutes of telecon 20th June 2006

> Are also ambiguous (this one was for David Hirtle). While 
> there are only two of us Dave's active then we could use 
> David for David Hirtle and Dave for myself but it might be 
> better to use DaveH/DaveR or full names in the minutes.
> 
> Dave(R)

Agreed -- the H/R distinction is probably best.

I try to remember to use David whenever referring to myself but
sometimes my fingers get lazy -- this is no doubt the problem for others
as well! 

David/DaveH 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dave Reynolds
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:19 AM
> To: Francois Bry
> Cc: W3C RIF WG
> Subject: Re: Draft minutes of telecon 20th June 2006
> 
> 
> A small point of clarification. The two entries in the sequence:
> 
> > Chris: What about PaulVincent's action?
> > Who replaces PaulVincent?
> > 
> > Christian: DaveReynolds?
> 
> are not related :-) Christian was asking "is DaveReynolds on 
> the phone" 
> prior to checking up on my actions, not answering Chris' question.
> 
> Comments like:
> 
> > Dave: I read it over. I think all of them need to be made 
> more consistent.
> > I can look at it.
> > 
> > Chris: Action on Dave?
> 
> Are also ambiguous (this one was for David Hirtle). While 
> there are only two of us Dave's active then we could use 
> David for David Hirtle and Dave for myself but it might be 
> better to use DaveH/DaveR or full names in the minutes.
> 
> Dave(R)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 23 June 2006 13:34:38 UTC