- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 14:33:34 +0100
- To: Alex Kozlenkov <alex.kozlenkov@betfair.com>
- CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Alex Kozlenkov wrote: > Dear All, > > Our company (Betfair Ltd., www.betfair.com) is in the process of > defining our strategy with respect to the W3C RIF standardization > effort. We have identified five broad areas where rule technology > standardization may have direct commercial impact on our business. > > According to preliminary analysis, structuring event/response mechanisms > using production and reaction rules to allow for complex event detection > and action workflows, complemented by non-trivial information > integration, as well as structuring workflows and protocols involving > machines and human beings will be at the top of our agenda. Simply > limiting the scope of rules interchange to reasoning based on derivation > rules does not generate a lot of support in our company. Since you mention "non-trivial information integration" I assume you mean that you do need derivation rules it is just that you *also* want to support variants of reaction/eca rules as well. Is that right? Dave
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 13:33:57 UTC