- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:59:18 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@inf.unibz.it>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
> On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 09:07 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > On May 27, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Michael Kifer wrote: > > > Peter, > > > > > > It is no big deal to be unitary by restricting the language to Datalog. > > > You don't even need to limit it to a function-free sublanguage. In our > > > roadmap the language was unitary also up to this point. > > > > > > The issue is how to build such a system in an extensible way so that it > > > could be extended to satisfy most of the RIF requirements. > > > > Which requirements? > > I'd really appreciate an answer, please. > > Which (candidate) requirement(s) do you have in mind > there, Michael? Sorry, I thought it was a rhetorical question. The issues are integration with NAF, constraints, production and active rules. All these are requirements coming from the group members. --michael
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2006 16:59:46 UTC