- From: Frank McCabe <frank.mccabe@us.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:39:18 -0700
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
On Jun 6, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 20:41 +0100, Dave Reynolds wrote: >> Michael Kifer wrote: >> >>>> Darn; I don't see links from any of the use cases to >>>> requirements... >>> >>> The cases were done before the requirements, and nobody updated >>> them. >>> (Because the requirements are still in flux, I guess.) >> >> The linking is currently expressed the other way round but it is >> there: >> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Use_Case_Support > > Aha! Thanks for the clue. > > I wonder why that wasn't linked. I added a link. > > Hmm... it seems to connect only at the goal level, not > at the testable requirement level. That is deliberate at this stage. So far we have not had any real debate about individual requirements (other than people wishing to have their favorite solutions stuck in as a requirement:) The UCR document is now a single point of reference where the debate can begin Frank > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:39:51 UTC