- From: Francois Bry <bry@ifi.lmu.de>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 09:19:36 +0200
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
jos.deroo@agfa.com wrote: > Right, well at least my limited implementation experience > learned me that this indeed works fine: taking a snapshot > of the state of the world so that it it is the case that > eventHappened(Event) can be asserted as a triple and > then deduce your actionRequested(Action) triple using > simple N3 rules (and it gives the same results as Drools). > It works fine only on simple examples. > As an aside, I believe to see that rules support the > unifying logic/proof layer and believe that we should > target the proof bus for meaningful communication and > driving the action and so I think that ECA is a hurry. > > ECA are no hurry but instead a must in practice. It is very puzzling, I feel, to have to argue about this. I thought, industry needs were better accepted in W3C... Francois
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2006 07:19:47 UTC