- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:48:45 +0100
- To: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Francis McCabe wrote: > This requirement is already captured: it is part of the oracular models > requirement. Agreed. The f2f discussion didn't like the term "oracular" as having other connotations. Then later on the case of SQL was raised in addition to SPARQL and then there's the issue of this being *one* way of coupling to a DL reasoner. For reasons that escaped me I ended up with the action to try to capture that discussion. I think it is intended to clarify the scope and nature of the requirement. I may not have succeeded in that aim. Dave
Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 06:48:51 UTC