- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 17:21:36 -0400
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
> > 4. Goal Analysis
>
> Goals not Goal Analysis.
>
> I'd put the goals/CSF before the requirements. To me those are our top
> level statements of intention (hence all my hassling about a fourth goal
> :-)) not just a way to group the requirements.
Makes sense. I was torn about this.
> > later (WD3?) - for each rule system/rule language, and for
> > each dialect, how does it match up to the discriminators?
> > (this would be a large table, or perhaps a set of tables, with
> > one per dialect).
>
> A table against the raw discriminators is likely to be fairly confusing.
> We have a lot of discriminators already and more to come. I think we'll
> need to some significant grouping and refinement (some sort of informal
> human-guided principle components analysis [*]) and should tabulate just
> against those summary discriminators.
Yeah, we can figure this out later. I guess the to key bit is to start
to be gathering this data (people's rifraf classifications of their
systems) in a machine usable form (eg RDF, or properly structured wiki
text), and then we can try to generate HTML for a comprehensible
document.
-- Sandro
Received on Saturday, 10 June 2006 21:21:47 UTC