- From: Hirtle, David <David.Hirtle@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:15:00 -0400
- To: "Christian de Sainte Marie" <csma@ilog.fr>, "Frank McCabe" <frank.mccabe@us.fujitsu.com>
- Cc: <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Hi Frank and Christian, Here's a convenient summary of diagram-related issues that should probably be addressed before the draft is published. (This is updated from the list I sent around earlier.) 1. As agreed during the telecon today, the "Alignment with widely deployed standards" and "Alignment with Semantic Web" CSFs should be merged into "Alignment with key W3C specifications". This CSF is supported by the "XML data", "XML types", "RDF data" and "OWL data" requirements, and supports the "Widescale adoption" and "W3C consistency" goals. 2. In the "Coverage" CSF diagram, "Embedded meta-data" --> "Embedded metadata" and "Rule Languages Coverage" --> "Rule language coverage" (to be consistent with text). 3. In its CSF diagram, "Encouragement of Interoperability" should not be pointed to by the "Compliance Model" req (http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Goals?action=AttachFile&do=get &target=interoperability.png). Note also the typo: "LImited number of dialects". 4. In its CSF diagram, "Extensibility" should oppose the "Low cost of implementation" CSF (http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Goals?action=AttachFile&do=get &target=extensibility.png). 5. In its CSF diagram, "Predictability" should not be pointed to by "Conformance Model" (http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Goals?action=AttachFile&do=get &target=noSurprises.png) 6. The legend still includes the notation for notes even though there are no actual notes anymore. Finally (less of a priority), there are lots of capitalization inconsistencies, e.g. "W3C Consistency" (title case) vs. "Widescale adoption" (sentence case). I suggest consistently going with sentence case since the text is that way and so are most of the diagrams. David
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2006 19:15:20 UTC