[UCR] Diagram issues

Hi Frank and Christian,

Here's a convenient summary of diagram-related issues that should
probably be addressed before the draft is published. (This is updated
from the list I sent around earlier.)

1. As agreed during the telecon today, the "Alignment with widely
deployed standards" and "Alignment with Semantic Web" CSFs should be
merged into "Alignment with key W3C specifications". This CSF is
supported by the "XML data", "XML types", "RDF data" and "OWL data"
requirements, and supports the "Widescale adoption" and "W3C
consistency" goals.

2. In the "Coverage" CSF diagram, "Embedded meta-data" --> "Embedded
metadata" and "Rule Languages Coverage" --> "Rule language coverage" (to
be consistent with text).

3. In its CSF diagram, "Encouragement of Interoperability" should not be
pointed to by the "Compliance Model" req
(http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Goals?action=AttachFile&do=get
&target=interoperability.png).

Note also the typo: "LImited number of dialects".

4. In its CSF diagram, "Extensibility" should oppose the "Low cost of
implementation" CSF
(http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Goals?action=AttachFile&do=get
&target=extensibility.png).

5. In its CSF diagram, "Predictability" should not be pointed to by
"Conformance Model"
(http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Goals?action=AttachFile&do=get
&target=noSurprises.png)

6. The legend still includes the notation for notes even though there
are no actual notes anymore.

Finally (less of a priority), there are lots of capitalization
inconsistencies, e.g. "W3C Consistency" (title case) vs. "Widescale
adoption" (sentence case). I suggest consistently going with sentence
case since the text is that way and so are most of the diagrams.

David

Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2006 19:15:20 UTC