- From: Chris Welty <cawelty@frontiernet.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:04:54 -0400
- To: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Specific comments on the new text for Use Case 2.10: The word "intensional" is being used in a way that I am unfamiliar with. The text seems to imply that intensional == implicit (which is isn't), and is contrasted with "factual" which is equated with "extensional" (which it also isn't). The text also seems to imply that e.g. "Every science fiction movie is a movie" is implicit and intensional - but the mere fact of saying it makes it explicit, so I'm really not sure what you mean. Unless I'm missing something, this does not correspond to any meaning I know, or can find, of intensional (or extensional, for that matter). I don't think "intensional" or "implicit" is what you want here, so I suggest not confusing a reader with obscure terminology that is used incorrectly. I realize "intensional" is a fairly slippery concept, and I don't want to get the WG bogged down in defining it. To be constructive, how about something like, "Publishing rules for interlinked metadata" -Chris -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. cawelty@frontiernet.net Hawthorne, NY 10532 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2006 02:05:04 UTC