- From: Alex Kozlenkov <alex.kozlenkov@betfair.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:10:20 +0100
- To: <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
I've verified the figures and the current count stands at 277. There are plans to have up to 500 by the end of the year. My apologies for a wrong estimate of 900 circulated earlier. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bijan Parsia [mailto:bparsia@isr.umd.edu] > Sent: 06 June 2006 16:51 > To: Stan Devitt > Cc: Alex Kozlenkov; Gerd Wagner; public-rif-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: "industry needs" > > On Jun 6, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Stan Devitt wrote: > > > The point here was not to debate the details and perceptions of of > > MathML > > I wasn't really trying to debate it, I was merely trying to learn > from that experience. I agree there are analogies between RIF and > MathML, but I also am trying to nail down what "widespread adoption" > really means, esp. as a *general* CSF. But it's hard to get very far > from your elliptical remarks, hence the request for further points. I > merely included the other pointers as evidence that I did try to find > this out myself (however quickly). > > > though I think it and the process that was followed does provide good > > counter examples to some of the ideas I have been hearing. > [snip] > > Not if they aren't accessible. Or rather, it's harder for them to do > so. Of course, this being the W3C, the discussions, at least, are > open. But the adoption probably comes from other sources. > > I tend to think that "widespread adoption" is a bit of a empty > whatever it is (requirement?). (In fact, I had an email from someone > off list where they said they understood "widespread adoption" to > mean "widespread adoption in the 'mainstream' rules community" where > the "'mainstream' rules community" was dominated by PR rules. So, "PR > rules are essential to widespread adoption" becomes, well, a > tautology.) I tend to think it's more important to know if *members* > are going to adoption/support it. So Alex's report is much more > interesting and informative (my skepticism wrt to the 900 IT > engineers notwithstanding) than these other ones. > > Forgive my skepticism, but when people appeal to certain facts, I > prefer some back up for those facts, particularly about things that > are in principle verifiable. > > Cheers, > Bijan. > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair use SkyScan from > MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses. > > ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:10:34 UTC