- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:50:43 -0500
- To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@inf.unibz.it>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 09:07 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > On May 27, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Michael Kifer wrote: > > Peter, > > > > It is no big deal to be unitary by restricting the language to Datalog. > > You don't even need to limit it to a function-free sublanguage. In our > > roadmap the language was unitary also up to this point. > > > > The issue is how to build such a system in an extensible way so that it > > could be extended to satisfy most of the RIF requirements. > > Which requirements? I'd really appreciate an answer, please. Which (candidate) requirement(s) do you have in mind there, Michael? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2006 16:50:47 UTC