SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1
Duplicate columns and group keys
- Re: Duplicate columns and group keys
- Re: Duplicate columns and group keys
- Re: Duplicate columns and group keys
http-rdf-update and the default graph
Resolution for ISSUE-37
3 new comments
Changes to Query 1.1
SPARQL WG Minutes from 28-Sep
LET / BIND / Assignment test cases (ISSUE-57)
isNumeric added to rq25
+ for fn:concat
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Sept. 28, 2010
Re: ACTION-272,Collect some Update test cases and put them in CVS
- Re: ACTION-272,Collect some Update test cases and put them in CVS
- Re: ACTION-272,Collect some Update test cases and put them in CVS
Tuesday's agenda
my regrets for Tuesday... still traveling...
Review of SPARQL 1.1 Query
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Query (Property paths, negation, select expression, testing values)
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Query (basic federated query)
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Query (Groups, aggregates and subquery)
Giving a Tutorial on SPARQL1.1 at RR2010 today...
Definition: Group in query editor's draft
Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317)
Review of SD document (ACTION-318)
Review of Query document
- Re: Review of Query document
- Re: Review of Query document (Groups, aggregates and subquery)
- Re: Review of Query document (basic federated query)
- Re: Review of Query document (Property paths, negation, select expression, testing values)
- Re: Review of Query document
[tests] MINUS is not multi-set difference use case?
Review for the service descriptions doc
Tomorrow's SPARQL TC *cancelled*
GROUP_CONCAT DISTINCT
isNumeric
http-rdf-update and RIF entailment changes
Entailment Doc ready for review
- Re: Entailment Doc ready for review
- Re: Entailment Doc ready for review
- Re: Entailment Doc ready for review
Minutes from today's meeting
SPARQL Update - meta data?
definition of "potentially bound" variable
more aggregate tests
Agenda TC 2010-09-14 (re-send, corrected date)
Agenda TC 2010-09-13
Apologies
Regrets for meeting 2010-09-13
querions regarding BINDINGS
New entailment test cases, completed ACTION-307
Minutes fro today's meeting
Regrets
at risk tomorrow for scribing...
Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-09-07
Comments on SPARQL 1.1. Update (5)
Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (4)
minutes last TC http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-08-31
Call for Exclusions (Update): SPARQL 1.1 Federation Extensions
Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3)
- Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3)
- Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3)
- Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3)
Comments on SPARQL 1.1. Update (2)
tomorrow's TC
service description update
First steps on SPARQL Update formal model
Investigation into submission -> SPARQL 1.1 Update
Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases...
- Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases...
- Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases...
- Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases...
- Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases...
Some comments on SPARQL 1.1. Update
SPARQL Update Syntax tests
regrets for next week
ACTION-275 completed
ungrouped variables used in projections
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Group by expressions
- Re: Group by expressions
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
- Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications?
GROUP_CONCAT aggregate test cases
ACTION-300 Check test cases agg01-agg07 - DONE
ACTION-297 Ask in RIF for another review from them - completed
minutes from today's TC 2010-08-24 ...
Agenda for tomorrow's TC 2010-08-24
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's TC 2010-08-24
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's TC 2010-08-24
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's TC 2010-08-24
minutes from last TC (2010-08-17)
Going to ISWC?
initial set of aggregates test cases plus ACTION-210
- Re: initial set of aggregates test cases plus ACTION-210
- Re: initial set of aggregates test cases plus ACTION-210
Survey on RDF Next Steps
6th Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP2010) - ***FInal*** Call for Papers - In Bressanone (Italy) Sep. 22-24, 2010
Call for Participation: 4th Int. Conf. on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (RR 2010) - Bressanone, Italy, Sep. 22-24, 2010
ISSUE-62: Shall there be more concise query syntax for all algebra operators http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html
ISSUE-61: Treatment of "alternative limit per resource" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html
Typos in SPARQL 1.1 Query Language
Ambiguity with protocol bindings to HTTP
SPARQL TC 2010-08-16
Summary of TimbL's comments on HTTP Protocol draft
Member Submission
project expression tests
Call for PhD positions at KRDB Centre, Free Univ. Bolzano, Italy - Deadline Oct. 18, 2010
limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
- Re: limit per resource rethought...
syntax for the algebra - or "shortcuts" for subselect
- Re: syntax for the algebra - or "shortcuts" for subselect
- Re: syntax for the algebra - or "shortcuts" for subselect
syntax for the algebra - or "shortcuts" for subselect
SPARQL WG Minutes from Tues., Aug. 10, 2010
ISSUE-60: What does the response to a SPARQL Update request look like in SPARQL protocol?
[TF-ENT] Updates to RIF Entailment section
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010
Introduction: Nico Michaelis
[tests] Updates of property path tests and some new ones as well.
Fwd: question regarding SERVICE extension
question regarding SERVICE extension
Trailing dot in update grammar
In Bressanone (Italy) - 6th Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP2010) - 2nd Call for Papers
Various updates to HTTP Protocol editor's draft
SPARQL TC 2010-08-03 Agenda
[TF-LIB] Encoding for IRIs
Reminder: SPARQL dedicated TC on update model on Friday
Change of affiliation
minutes of today's TC are online...
protocol issues and do we need a dedicated TC on them?
- Re: protocol issues and do we need a dedicated TC on them?
- Re: protocol issues and do we need a dedicated TC on them?
ISSUE-59: Shall we add shortcuts for update as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0053.html
FYI: RIF WG Review of RIF Entailment regime
Draft response to RV-4
SPARQL TC 2010-07-27 Agenda
tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. )
- Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. )
- Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. )
- Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. )
- Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. )
- Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) [ISSUE-19]
page about the term "named graphs"
- Re: page about the term "named graphs"
- Re: page about the term "named graphs"
ISSUE-58: Register a MIME type for SPARQL Update requests?
What we mean by "graph" / Named Graphs in SD
- Re: What we mean by "graph" / Named Graphs in SD
- Re: What we mean by "graph" / Named Graphs in SD
- Re: What we mean by "graph" / Named Graphs in SD
- Re: What we mean by "graph" / Named Graphs in SD
Signalling entailment in queries
- Re: Signalling entailment in queries
- Re: Signalling entailment in queries
- Re: Signalling entailment in queries
minutes from today's TC http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-07-20
draft response to PA-2
a minor thing... prefix syntax
Appologies
Added description of entailment evaluation tests to test case README (ACTION-268 completed)
- Re: Added description of entailment evaluation tests to test case README (ACTION-268 completed)
- Re: Added description of entailment evaluation tests to test case README (ACTION-268 completed)
4 basic update test cases added
SPARQL test case structure for update test cases (ACTION-267 completed)
- Re: SPARQL test case structure for update test cases (ACTION-267 completed)
- Re: SPARQL test case structure for update test cases (ACTION-267 completed)
updated answer draft to coment PA-1, please check.
Hello all
Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-07-20
Scheduling dedicated TC for SPARQL Update formal model
In Bressanone (Italy) - 6th Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP2010) - Call for Papers
Shortcuts in Update
comments on property path tests
Minutes for 2010-07-13
basic-update/manifest.ttl
[TF-ENT] Some minor changes in the ent. reg. doc
Media type for SPARQL Update, and a protocol question.
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. July 13, 2010
Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1)
- Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1)
- Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1)
- Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1)
- Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1)
Test cases for delete
Re: Fwd: Re: possible erratum
ARQ implementation of LET
Fwd: changed FR and UK dial-in numbers for teleconferences
SPARQL WG Minutes - 2010-07-06
Re: Syntax issues, UNION and MINUS
SPARQL Update feature
- Re: SPARQL Update feature