Re: Typos in SPARQL 1.1 Query Language

• From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
• Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:21:54 +0100
• To: Olivier Corby <Olivier.Corby@sophia.inria.fr>
• CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4C72BC42.30603@epimorphics.com>

Thanks for those - we fixed rq25.

	Andy

On 17/08/2010 1:59 PM, Olivier Corby wrote:
> I have found  typos in
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml
>
> Olivier
>
>
>
>
> 8 Negation
>
> incoporates
>
> filterd
>
>
> 8.3 Relationship and difference between NOT EXISTS and MINUS
>
> elimiminates
>
>
> 10.2.1 Set Functions
>
> expressesions
>
> counts the number times
>
> The make use of the
>
> mutiset
>
>
> 10.2.2 Mapping from Abstract Syntax to Algebra
>
> Aggregation((?a), (?val), Sum, (), BGP(?x rdf:value ?val)).
>
> *** ?x should be ?a
>
>
> 11 Subqueries
>
> squence
>
>
> 15.3 Operator Mapping
>
> candiate
>
> defintions
>
>
>
> 15.4.16 IN
>
> comparsions
>
> SPARQl
>
>
>
> 15.4.17 NOT IN
>
> equalivalent
>
>
> 15.4.21 STRDT
>
> specificed
>
>
> 16.5 Evaluation Semantics
>
> Distict(L)
>

Received on Monday, 23 August 2010 18:22:37 UTC