Re: Entailment Doc ready for review

Hey Chime,

On Sep 14, 2010, at 21:38 , Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
>> Ivan also wanted to know whether the URL for the regime is stable:
>> @Ivan: The namespace doc/URI (not sure how to call it) is already
>> created and has some reasonable text:
>> Unique identifier defined for RIF Logical Entailment.
> I think the only question (long ago) was whether the namespace URL should
> indicate variants of RIF entailment, but given where we eventually settled
> on simple RIF entailment -  IMO - the current URL is fine and so I will
> remove the editorial note regarding this.

that was indeed the issue. Ie, this problem is now closed. Thanks!


Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key:

Received on Wednesday, 15 September 2010 12:54:41 UTC