Re: Entailment Doc ready for review

On 20/09/10 20:29, Birte Glimm wrote:
> We could also say that within the document an entailment regimes is
> actually understood as taking an entailment relation and define
> condiions on its use so that the SPARQL conditions on extensions are
> met.

I think that something along those lines would be a good idea.  When the 
terminology was deep inside the query spec, the somewhat technical 
definition was OK, but it's now part of a document title so a more 
accessible definition would be better.

 Andy

Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 15:39:19 UTC