SPARQL TC 2010-08-17

Quite obviously, the subject of my previous mails was confusing, I am talking about the TC tomorrow, 2010-08-17

details to follow shortly,

Axel
 
On 16 Aug 2010, at 16:52, Axel Polleres wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> we want to discusss mainly two things tomorrow:
> 
> - response to Tim's comments (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Aug/0004.html) please check Chime's mail:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0227.html\
> 
> - How do we proceed with ISSUEs likely to be postponed:
>  The "limit per resource" discussion [1] or syntax shortcuts for query [2]
>  are I think only two examples of that. While I don't want to spend telecon 
>  time on discussing those issues, acknowledging that we're probably better off to leave them 
>  for a potential future WG, we should discuss briefly how we will process with "leftovers" 
>  for a future WG, see DAWG's postponed issues [3]. Among those might also fall the features 
>  which didn't make it this round
> 

p.s.: time allowed, let's see whether we can briefly touch upon the marking 
of the SPARQL Update member submission issue [4]

4. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0220.html

> detailed agenda will follow later this evening,
> Axel
> 
> 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html
> 2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html
> 3. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues
> 
>

Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 16:00:16 UTC