- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:33:59 +0100
- To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Sorry about that. Now fixed in CVS Andy On 02/09/10 03:55, Gregory Williams wrote: > On Sep 1, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> I have added SPARQL Update syntax tests to the SPARQL WG test area: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-update-1/ >> >> contains a set of tests for each syntax form. (I manage these tests as a single script for convenience elsewhere) > > Andy, > > I'm a bit unsure of syntax-update-32.ru (compared to syntax-update-33.ru). They are both listed as positive syntax tests, but the only difference seems to be that syntax-update-32.ru doesn't separate multiple operations with a semicolon. Shouldn't this result in it being a negative syntax test? > > thanks, > .greg >
Received on Friday, 3 September 2010 12:34:37 UTC