Re: Resolution for ISSUE-37

On 2010-09-29, at 18:55, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> On 9/29/2010 1:42 PM, Alexandre Passant wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I'm checking current issues in the Update doc, and see that ISSUE-37 is closed.
>> 
>> RESOLVED: close ISSUE-37 by adding a note to Update mentioning possible feedback effects
>> +
>> ACTION: paul to add a note on possible feedback effects of federated queries in update (ACTION-289)
>> 
>> Do Paul or anyone remind what we meant by "feedback effects" here ?
>> Seems to relate to atomicity ?
> 
> The use case in question involved using SERVICE in the WHERE clause of an update operation, I believe.

That's correct. Different levels of atomicity could lead different stores to return different results.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD

Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 07:05:29 UTC