- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:56:44 +0100
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 16 Aug 2010, at 16:52, Axel Polleres wrote: > Hi all, > > we want to discusss mainly two things tomorrow: > > - response to Tim's comments (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Aug/0004.html) please check Chime's mail: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0227.html\ > > - How do we proceed with ISSUEs likely to be postponed: > The "limit per resource" discussion [1] or syntax shortcuts for query [2] > are I think only two examples of that. While I don't want to spend telecon > time on discussing those issues, acknowledging that we're probably better off to leave them > for a potential future WG, we should discuss briefly how we will process with "leftovers" > for a future WG, see DAWG's postponed issues [3]. Among those might also fall the features > which didn't make it this round > p.s.: time allowed, let's see whether we can briefly touch upon the marking of the SPARQL Update member submission issue [4] 4. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0220.html > detailed agenda will follow later this evening, > Axel > > 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html > 2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html > 3. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues > >
Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 15:57:19 UTC