- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:45:11 -0400
- To: Olivier Corby <Olivier.Corby@sophia.inria.fr>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I agree with the results of all of these test cases, though the syntax needs some tweaking for the data and for some of the queries. These test and illustrate good interactions, so let's be sure to agree when we talk about them on the TC. (In particular, they illustrate that the subquery shares the parent query's RDF dataset (which we explicitly decided), and also that the active graph (GRAPH <...>) is passed along to a subquery from the parent query (which we haven't explicitly decided but which personally makes sense to me, and which I think would be my interpretation of the current editor's draft.) Lee On 6/28/2010 11:21 AM, Olivier Corby wrote: > Here is a first set of sub query test case. > > Best regards > > Olivier
Received on Monday, 5 July 2010 17:45:57 UTC