- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:56:54 +0100
- To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Chime, this is to discharge my ACTION-316. Could you summarise what still needs to be done to the RIF part of the Ent. Reg. doc or is it ready for review for the next round of WDs? The rif:imports already has an ed. note, so I think that is fine and will not fully be resolved with the RIF WG before the next WD. Ivan also wanted to know whether the URL for the regime is stable: http://www.w3.org/ns/entailment/RIF @Ivan: The namespace doc/URI (not sure how to call it) is already created and has some reasonable text: Unique identifier defined for RIF Logical Entailment. “http://www.w3.org/ns/entailment/RIF” is the URI. The specification for the entailment is part of the RIF W3C Recommendation. For more information about RIF, please refer to the the RIF Document Overview Document. Ivan Herman, ivan@w3.org, W3C, Semantic Web Activity Lead, May 3rd, 2010 As far as I can see, only rif:imports is still open. Birte -- Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309 Computing Laboratory Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QD United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 283520
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 18:57:23 UTC