public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from July to September 2010 by date

Thursday, 30 September 2010

Re: Duplicate columns and group keys Steve Harris
Re: Resolution for ISSUE-37 Alexandre Passant
Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Alexandre Passant
SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Axel Polleres
Re: Duplicate columns and group keys Gregory Williams
Re: Duplicate columns and group keys Gregory Williams
Re: Duplicate columns and group keys Andy Seaborne
Re: LET / BIND / Assignment test cases (ISSUE-57) Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Duplicate columns and group keys Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Duplicate columns and group keys Steve Harris
Duplicate columns and group keys Andy Seaborne
Re: LET / BIND / Assignment test cases (ISSUE-57) Andy Seaborne
Re: http-rdf-update and the default graph Andy Seaborne
Re: http-rdf-update and the default graph Steve Harris
Re: Resolution for ISSUE-37 Steve Harris

Wednesday, 29 September 2010

http-rdf-update and the default graph Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of SD document (ACTION-318) Gregory Williams
Re: Resolution for ISSUE-37 Lee Feigenbaum
Re: ACTION-272,Collect some Update test cases and put them in CVS Matt Perry
Re: ACTION-272,Collect some Update test cases and put them in CVS Gregory Williams
Resolution for ISSUE-37 Alexandre Passant
3 new comments Axel Polleres
Re: + for fn:concat Steve Harris
Changes to Query 1.1 Steve Harris
SPARQL WG Minutes from 28-Sep Lee Feigenbaum
LET / BIND / Assignment test cases (ISSUE-57) Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 28 September 2010

isNumeric added to rq25 Andy Seaborne
Re: + for fn:concat Gregory Williams
+ for fn:concat Andy Seaborne
Re: Tuesday's agenda Alexandre Passant
Re: Tuesday's agenda Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: Review of SD document (ACTION-318) Alexandre Passant
Re: ACTION-272,Collect some Update test cases and put them in CVS Andy Seaborne
Re: isNumeric Steve Harris

Monday, 27 September 2010

SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Sept. 28, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum
Re: isNumeric Andy Seaborne
Re: Tuesday's agenda Andy Seaborne
Re: ACTION-272,Collect some Update test cases and put them in CVS Matt Perry
Re: isNumeric Steve Harris
Re: Definition: Group in query editor's draft Steve Harris
Re: isNumeric Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of Query document Steve Harris
Re: Definition: Group in query editor's draft Lee Feigenbaum
Re: isNumeric Polleres, Axel
Re: isNumeric Andy Seaborne
Re: Definition: Group in query editor's draft Steve Harris
Re: isNumeric Steve Harris

Sunday, 26 September 2010

Tuesday's agenda Lee Feigenbaum

Saturday, 25 September 2010

my regrets for Tuesday... still traveling... Axel Polleres

Friday, 24 September 2010

Re: Review of SD document (ACTION-318) Gregory Williams
Re: Review for the service descriptions doc Gregory Williams
Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Query (Property paths, negation, select expression, testing values) Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of Query document (Property paths, negation, select expression, testing values) Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 23 September 2010

Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Query (Groups, aggregates and subquery) Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Query (basic federated query) Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Query (Property paths, negation, select expression, testing values) Andy Seaborne
Re: Definition: Group in query editor's draft Axel Polleres
Re: Definition: Group in query editor's draft Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 22 September 2010

Review of SPARQL 1.1 Query Matt Perry
Re: Entailment Doc ready for review Birte Glimm
Re: Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) Birte Glimm
Re: Review of Query document (Property paths, negation, select expression, testing values) Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of Query document (basic federated query) Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of Query document (Groups, aggregates and subquery) Andy Seaborne
Giving a Tutorial on SPARQL1.1 at RR2010 today... Axel Polleres
Definition: Group in query editor's draft Axel Polleres

Tuesday, 21 September 2010

Re: Entailment Doc ready for review Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of Query document Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of Query document Nico Michaelis
Review of Entailment Regimes (Action-317) Olivier Corby
Review of SD document (ACTION-318) Alexandre Passant
Re: Review of Query document Andy Seaborne
Re: Review of Query document Gregory Williams

Monday, 20 September 2010

Review of Query document Gregory Williams
[tests] MINUS is not multi-set difference use case? Axel Polleres
Re: Entailment Doc ready for review Birte Glimm
Review for the service descriptions doc Birte Glimm
Re: Evaluation of aggregates Andy Seaborne
Tomorrow's SPARQL TC *cancelled* Axel Polleres
Re: Evaluation of aggregates Axel Polleres
Re: Evaluation of aggregates Andy Seaborne
Re: Evaluation of aggregates (was: Re: isNumeric) Axel Polleres
Evaluation of aggregates (was: Re: isNumeric) Andy Seaborne
Re: GROUP_CONCAT DISTINCT Andy Seaborne
Re: isNumeric Axel Polleres
Re: isNumeric Andy Seaborne
Re: more aggregate tests Andy Seaborne
Re: more aggregate tests Gregory Williams

Sunday, 19 September 2010

Re: GROUP_CONCAT DISTINCT Axel Polleres
Re: GROUP_CONCAT DISTINCT Lee Feigenbaum
GROUP_CONCAT DISTINCT Axel Polleres
Re: isNumeric Axel Polleres
isNumeric Axel Polleres

Saturday, 18 September 2010

Re: more aggregate tests Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 16 September 2010

Re: Entailment Doc ready for review Birte Glimm
Re: Entailment Doc ready for review Olivier Corby

Wednesday, 15 September 2010

Re: Entailment Doc ready for review Ivan Herman
http-rdf-update and RIF entailment changes Chimezie Ogbuji

Tuesday, 14 September 2010

Re: Entailment Doc ready for review Birte Glimm
Re: Entailment Doc ready for review Chimezie Ogbuji
Entailment Doc ready for review Birte Glimm
Minutes from today's meeting Gregory Williams
Re: more aggregate tests Gregory Williams
Re: Regrets for meeting 2010-09-13 Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: SPARQL Update - meta data? Andy Seaborne
Re: more aggregate tests Lee Feigenbaum
Re: SPARQL Update - meta data? Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Agenda TC 2010-09-13 Axel Polleres
Re: Agenda TC 2010-09-13 Andy Seaborne
Re: definition of "potentially bound" variable Andy Seaborne
Re: definition of "potentially bound" variable Andy Seaborne
Re: Agenda TC 2010-09-13 Axel Polleres
Re: definition of "potentially bound" variable Axel Polleres
Re: definition of "potentially bound" variable Axel Polleres
Re: Regrets for meeting 2010-09-13 Nico Michaelis
Re: definition of "potentially bound" variable Andy Seaborne
SPARQL Update - meta data? Andy Seaborne
definition of "potentially bound" variable Axel Polleres
Re: more aggregate tests Andy Seaborne
Re: Agenda TC 2010-09-13 Andy Seaborne
more aggregate tests Gregory Williams

Monday, 13 September 2010

Agenda TC 2010-09-14 (re-send, corrected date) Axel Polleres
Agenda TC 2010-09-13 Axel Polleres
Apologies Paul Gearon
Regrets for meeting 2010-09-13 Nicholas Humfrey

Saturday, 11 September 2010

Re: querions regarding BINDINGS Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 9 September 2010

querions regarding BINDINGS Carlos Buil Aranda

Tuesday, 7 September 2010

New entailment test cases, completed ACTION-307 Birte Glimm
Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases... Birte Glimm
Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases... Axel Polleres
Re: Minutes fro today's meeting Sandro Hawke
Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases... Birte Glimm
Minutes fro today's meeting Birte Glimm
Regrets Steve Harris
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-09-07 Souri Das

Monday, 6 September 2010

Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-09-07 Andy Seaborne
Re: at risk tomorrow for scribing... Axel Polleres
at risk tomorrow for scribing... Axel Polleres
Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-09-07 Axel Polleres

Friday, 3 September 2010

Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3) Steve Harris
Re: First steps on SPARQL Update formal model Alexandre Passant
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3) Alexandre Passant
Comments on SPARQL 1.1. Update (5) Andy Seaborne
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3) Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL Update Syntax tests Andy Seaborne
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (4) Andy Seaborne
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3) Steve Harris
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (4) Steve Harris
Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (4) Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 2 September 2010

minutes last TC http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-08-31 Axel Polleres
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3) Andy Seaborne
Call for Exclusions (Update): SPARQL 1.1 Federation Extensions Ian Jacobs
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3) Andy Seaborne
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3) Steve Harris
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3) Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL Update Syntax tests Gregory Williams
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3) Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 1 September 2010

Re: SPARQL Update Syntax tests Andy Seaborne
Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Update (3) Andy Seaborne
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1. Update (2) Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 31 August 2010

Re: First steps on SPARQL Update formal model Andy Seaborne
Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1. Update (2) Alexandre Passant
Re: regrets Chimezie Ogbuji
Comments on SPARQL 1.1. Update (2) Andy Seaborne
Re: Group by expressions Polleres, Axel
Re: First steps on SPARQL Update formal model Alexandre Passant
Group by expressions Andy Seaborne
Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases... Birte Glimm
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues., Aug. 31, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum

Monday, 30 August 2010

tomorrow's TC Axel Polleres
regrets Olivier.Corby@sophia.inria.fr
Re: First steps on SPARQL Update formal model Andy Seaborne
service description update Gregory Williams
First steps on SPARQL Update formal model Alexandre Passant
Re: Some comments on SPARQL 1.1. Update Andy Seaborne
Re: Some comments on SPARQL 1.1. Update Alexandre Passant

Saturday, 28 August 2010

Investigation into submission -> SPARQL 1.1 Update Andy Seaborne
Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases... Axel Polleres

Friday, 27 August 2010

Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases... Birte Glimm
Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases... Polleres, Axel
Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases... Birte Glimm
Re: Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases... Birte Glimm
Thinking out lout about some strange SPARQL entailment test cases... Axel Polleres
Re: Some comments on SPARQL 1.1. Update Andy Seaborne
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Steve Harris
Some comments on SPARQL 1.1. Update Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 26 August 2010

Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Axel Polleres
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Steve Harris
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Andy Seaborne
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Andy Seaborne
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Andy Seaborne
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Steve Harris
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Steve Harris
Re: project expression tests Andy Seaborne
Re: project expression tests Olivier Corby

Wednesday, 25 August 2010

Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Axel Polleres
Re: More aggregates test cases Axel Polleres
Re: More aggregates test cases Andy Seaborne
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Andy Seaborne
Re: More aggregates test cases (was: ungrouped variables used in projections) Axel Polleres
Re: More aggregates test cases (was: ungrouped variables used in projections) Gregory Williams
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Gregory Williams
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Axel Polleres
Re: GROUP_CONCAT aggregate test cases Gregory Williams
Re: GROUP_CONCAT aggregate test cases Andy Seaborne
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Andy Seaborne
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Axel Polleres
SPARQL Update Syntax tests Andy Seaborne
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Andy Seaborne
Re: More aggregates test cases Axel Polleres
Re: More aggregates test cases Steve Harris
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections - Further implications? Axel Polleres
regrets for next week Axel Polleres
Re: More aggregates test cases Axel Polleres
Re: More aggregates test cases Andy Seaborne
More aggregates test cases (was: ungrouped variables used in projections) Axel Polleres
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections Axel Polleres
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 24 August 2010

Re: ungrouped variables used in projections Steve Harris
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections Lee Feigenbaum
ACTION-275 completed Axel Polleres
Re: ungrouped variables used in projections Axel Polleres
ungrouped variables used in projections Axel Polleres
GROUP_CONCAT aggregate test cases Gregory Williams
Re: project expression tests Axel Polleres
ACTION-300 Check test cases agg01-agg07 - DONE Andy Seaborne
ACTION-297 Ask in RIF for another review from them - completed Axel Polleres
minutes from today's TC 2010-08-24 ... Axel Polleres
Re: project expression tests Andy Seaborne
Re: project expression tests Gregory Williams
Re: project expression tests Axel Polleres
Re: project expression tests Axel Polleres
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's TC 2010-08-24 Gregory Williams
Re: Overview document Axel Polleres
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's TC 2010-08-24 Axel Polleres
Overview document Andy Seaborne
Re: Going to ISWC? Alexandre Passant
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's TC 2010-08-24 Axel Polleres
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's TC 2010-08-24 Gregory Williams

Monday, 23 August 2010

Re: Agenda for tomorrow's TC 2010-08-24 Axel Polleres
Re: Going to ISWC? Birte Glimm
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's TC 2010-08-24 Andy Seaborne
Agenda for tomorrow's TC 2010-08-24 Axel Polleres
Re: Typos in SPARQL 1.1 Query Language Andy Seaborne
minutes from last TC (2010-08-17) Axel Polleres
Re: Going to ISWC? Axel Polleres
Re: Going to ISWC? Steve Harris
Re: Going to ISWC? Kendall Clark
Going to ISWC? Sandro Hawke
Re: initial set of aggregates test cases plus ACTION-210 Andy Seaborne
Re: initial set of aggregates test cases plus ACTION-210 Axel Polleres
Re: initial set of aggregates test cases plus ACTION-210 Andy Seaborne
Re: initial set of aggregates test cases plus ACTION-210 Gregory Williams

Sunday, 22 August 2010

initial set of aggregates test cases plus ACTION-210 Axel Polleres

Saturday, 21 August 2010

Re: limit per resource rethought... Steve Harris
Re: project expression tests Andy Seaborne
Re: limit per resource rethought... Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 19 August 2010

Survey on RDF Next Steps Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 18 August 2010

Tuesday, 17 August 2010

ISSUE-62: Shall there be more concise query syntax for all algebra operators http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-61: Treatment of "alternative limit per resource" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
Typos in SPARQL 1.1 Query Language Olivier Corby

Monday, 16 August 2010

SPARQL TC 2010-08-17 Agenda Axel Polleres
Ambiguity with protocol bindings to HTTP Chimezie Ogbuji
SPARQL TC 2010-08-17 Axel Polleres
Re: SPARQL TC 2010-08-16 Axel Polleres
SPARQL TC 2010-08-16 Axel Polleres
Summary of TimbL's comments on HTTP Protocol draft Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: Member Submission Steve Harris

Sunday, 15 August 2010

Re: Member Submission Alexandre Passant
Re: Member Submission Andy Seaborne

Saturday, 14 August 2010

Re: Member Submission Alexandre Passant
Re: Member Submission Sandro Hawke
Re: limit per resource rethought... Steve Harris
Member Submission Steve Harris

Friday, 13 August 2010

Re: limit per resource rethought... Andy Seaborne
Re: limit per resource rethought... Axel Polleres
Re: limit per resource rethought... Steve Harris
Re: limit per resource rethought... Paul Gearon
Re: limit per resource rethought... Axel Polleres
Re: limit per resource rethought... Steve Harris
Re: limit per resource rethought... Axel Polleres
Re: limit per resource rethought... Steve Harris
Re: limit per resource rethought... Steve Harris
Re: limit per resource rethought... Steve Harris
Re: limit per resource rethought... Axel Polleres
Re: limit per resource rethought... Axel Polleres

Thursday, 12 August 2010

project expression tests Gregory Williams
Re: limit per resource rethought... Andy Seaborne
Re: limit per resource rethought... Steve Harris
Re: limit per resource rethought... Andy Seaborne
Re: limit per resource rethought... Axel Polleres

Wednesday, 11 August 2010

Call for PhD positions at KRDB Centre, Free Univ. Bolzano, Italy - Deadline Oct. 18, 2010 Diego Calvanese
Re: limit per resource rethought... Paul Gearon
Re: syntax for the algebra - or "shortcuts" for subselect Axel Polleres
Re: limit per resource rethought... Axel Polleres
Re: syntax for the algebra - or "shortcuts" for subselect Andy Seaborne
Re: syntax for the algebra - or "shortcuts" for subselect Steve Harris
Re: limit per resource rethought... Steve Harris
Re: limit per resource rethought... Steve Harris
limit per resource rethought... Axel Polleres
syntax for the algebra - or "shortcuts" for subselect Axel Polleres
please ignore - Re: syntax for the algebra - or "shortcuts" for subselect Axel Polleres
syntax for the algebra - or "shortcuts" for subselect Axel Polleres

Tuesday, 10 August 2010

Re: page about the term "named graphs" Birte Glimm
SPARQL WG Minutes from Tues., Aug. 10, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum
ISSUE-60: What does the response to a SPARQL Update request look like in SPARQL protocol? SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010 Nico Michaelis

Monday, 9 August 2010

[TF-ENT] Updates to RIF Entailment section Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010 Souri Das
Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010 Gregory Williams
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum

Thursday, 5 August 2010

Introduction: Nico Michaelis Nico Michaelis

Wednesday, 4 August 2010

Re: [tests] Updates of property path tests and some new ones as well. Gregory Williams
[tests] Updates of property path tests and some new ones as well. Andy Seaborne
Re: question regarding SERVICE extension Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 3 August 2010

Fwd: question regarding SERVICE extension Carlos Buil Aranda
question regarding SERVICE extension Carlos Buil Aranda
Re: SPARQL TC 2010-08-03 Agenda Alexandre Passant
Re: SPARQL TC 2010-08-03 Agenda Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: Trailing dot in update grammar Andy Seaborne
Re: Trailing dot in update grammar Steve Harris
Re: Trailing dot in update grammar Andy Seaborne
Trailing dot in update grammar Steve Harris
In Bressanone (Italy) - 6th Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP2010) - 2nd Call for Papers Diego Calvanese

Monday, 2 August 2010

Various updates to HTTP Protocol editor's draft Chimezie Ogbuji
SPARQL TC 2010-08-03 Agenda Axel Polleres
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Kendall Clark

Sunday, 1 August 2010

Re: Signalling entailment in queries Gregory Williams
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Sandro Hawke

Saturday, 31 July 2010

Re: Signalling entailment in queries Gregory Williams

Friday, 30 July 2010

Re: Reminder: SPARQL dedicated TC on update model on Friday Alexandre Passant
Re: Reminder: SPARQL dedicated TC on update model on Friday Lee Feigenbaum

Thursday, 29 July 2010

Re: [TF-LIB] Encoding for IRIs Mischa Tuffield
[TF-LIB] Encoding for IRIs Andy Seaborne
Reminder: SPARQL dedicated TC on update model on Friday Lee Feigenbaum

Wednesday, 28 July 2010

Change of affiliation Andy Seaborne
RE: FYI: RIF WG Review of RIF Entailment regime Ogbuji, Chimezie
Re: FYI: RIF WG Review of RIF Entailment regime Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 27 July 2010

Re: protocol issues and do we need a dedicated TC on them? Andy Seaborne
Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) Lee Feigenbaum
Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) Andy Seaborne
Re: protocol issues and do we need a dedicated TC on them? Alexandre Passant
Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) Axel Polleres
minutes of today's TC are online... Axel Polleres
protocol issues and do we need a dedicated TC on them? Axel Polleres
ISSUE-59: Shall we add shortcuts for update as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0053.html SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Shortcuts in Update/Explanatory queries in http-rdf-update Axel Polleres
Re: Shortcuts in Update Axel Polleres
Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) Andy Seaborne
FYI: RIF WG Review of RIF Entailment regime Ogbuji, Chimezie
Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) Axel Polleres
Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) Lee Feigenbaum
Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) [ISSUE-19] Alexandre Passant
Draft response to RV-4 Steve Harris

Monday, 26 July 2010

Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) Gregory Williams
Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) Andy Seaborne
SPARQL TC 2010-07-27 Agenda Axel Polleres
Re: tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) Chimezie Ogbuji
tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) Axel Polleres
Re: Test cases combining MINUS and NOT EXISTS Steve Harris

Saturday, 24 July 2010

Test cases combining MINUS and NOT EXISTS Andy Seaborne
Re: Mutability and graphs [was: Re: page about the term "named graphs"] Andy Seaborne

Friday, 23 July 2010

Re: Mutability and graphs [was: Re: page about the term "named graphs"] Axel Polleres
Re: Mutability and graphs [was: Re: page about the term "named graphs"] Axel Polleres
Re: Mutability and graphs [was: Re: page about the term "named graphs"] Andy Seaborne
Re: Mutability and graphs [was: Re: page about the term "named graphs"] Andy Seaborne
Re: Mutability and graphs [was: Re: page about the term "named graphs"] Axel Polleres

Thursday, 22 July 2010

Mutability and graphs [was: Re: page about the term "named graphs"] Andy Seaborne
Re: page about the term "named graphs" Axel Polleres
page about the term "named graphs" Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Re: Added description of entailment evaluation tests to test case README (ACTION-268 completed) Polleres, Axel
Re: Added description of entailment evaluation tests to test case README (ACTION-268 completed) Birte Glimm
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Kendall Clark
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL test case structure for update test cases (ACTION-267 completed) Axel Polleres
Re: Added description of entailment evaluation tests to test case README (ACTION-268 completed) Axel Polleres
Re: ARQ implementation of LET Paul Gearon
Re: What we mean by "graph" / Named Graphs in SD Andy Seaborne
Re: Shortcuts in Update Andy Seaborne
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: Added description of entailment evaluation tests to test case README (ACTION-268 completed) Andy Seaborne
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Kendall Clark
ISSUE-58: Register a MIME type for SPARQL Update requests? SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: SPARQL test case structure for update test cases (ACTION-267 completed) Andy Seaborne
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Alexandre Passant
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Alexandre Passant
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Birte Glimm
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Steve Harris
Re: What we mean by "graph" / Named Graphs in SD Steve Harris
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Sandro Hawke
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: What we mean by "graph" / Named Graphs in SD Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Chimezie Ogbuji

Tuesday, 20 July 2010

Re: Signalling entailment in queries Kendall Clark
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Sandro Hawke
Re: What we mean by "graph" / Named Graphs in SD Axel Polleres
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Gregory Williams
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Sandro Hawke
Re: a minor thing... prefix syntax Andy Seaborne
Re: Signalling entailment in queries Birte Glimm
What we mean by "graph" / Named Graphs in SD Sandro Hawke
Signalling entailment in queries Sandro Hawke
Re: draft response to PA-2 Axel Polleres
Re: draft response to PA-2 Gregory Williams
Re: draft response to PA-2 Axel Polleres
Re: SPARQL test case structure for update test cases (ACTION-267 completed) Axel Polleres
minutes from today's TC http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-07-20 Axel Polleres
Re: updated answer draft to comment PA-1, please check. Axel Polleres
draft response to PA-2 Gregory Williams
Re: a minor thing... prefix syntax Axel Polleres
Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1) Gregory Williams
Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1) Axel Polleres
Re: a minor thing... prefix syntax Andy Seaborne
a minor thing... prefix syntax Axel Polleres
Re: updated answer draft to comment PA-1, please check. Alexandre Passant
Re: updated answer draft to comment PA-1, please check. Andy Seaborne
Appologies Steve Harris
Added description of entailment evaluation tests to test case README (ACTION-268 completed) Axel Polleres
Re: 4 basic update test cases added Axel Polleres
Re: 4 basic update test cases added Alexandre Passant
4 basic update test cases added Axel Polleres
SPARQL test case structure for update test cases (ACTION-267 completed) Axel Polleres
Re: updated answer draft to comment PA-1, please check. Axel Polleres
Re: updated answer draft to comment PA-1, please check. Andy Seaborne
updated answer draft to coment PA-1, please check. Axel Polleres
Re: Hello all Axel Polleres
Hello all Carlos Buil Aranda

Monday, 19 July 2010

Re: 4 MINUS and NOT EXISTS test cases Andy Seaborne
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-07-20 Axel Polleres
Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-07-20 Alexandre Passant
Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-07-20 Axel Polleres
Re: 4 MINUS and NOT EXISTS test cases Chimezie Ogbuji
Scheduling dedicated TC for SPARQL Update formal model Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Shortcuts in Update Alexandre Passant
Re: Shortcuts in Update Andy Seaborne

Sunday, 18 July 2010

Re: Shortcuts in Update Lee Feigenbaum
In Bressanone (Italy) - 6th Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP2010) - Call for Papers Diego Calvanese

Friday, 16 July 2010

Shortcuts in Update Alexandre Passant
Re: SPARQL Update feature Alexandre Passant

Thursday, 15 July 2010

Re: SPARQL Update feature Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL Update feature Alexandre Passant
Re: Subquery tests: [was: ACTION-270 completed] Lee Feigenbaum

Wednesday, 14 July 2010

Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1) Gregory Williams
Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1) Gregory Williams
Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1) Gregory Williams

Tuesday, 13 July 2010

Re: Subquery tests: [was: ACTION-270 completed] Andy Seaborne
comments on property path tests Gregory Williams
Minutes for 2010-07-13 Alexandre Passant
basic-update/manifest.ttl Gregory Williams
Re: SPARQL Update feature Steve Harris
Re: SPARQL Update feature Alexandre Passant
[TF-ENT] Some minor changes in the ent. reg. doc Birte Glimm
Re: SPARQL Update feature Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL Update feature Steve Harris
Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1) Sandro Hawke
Re: SPARQL Update feature Steve Harris
Re: SPARQL Update feature Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL Update feature Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL Update feature Steve Harris
Re: SPARQL Update feature Alexandre Passant
Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1) Alexandre Passant
Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1) Andy Seaborne
Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1) Andy Seaborne
Media type for SPARQL Update, and a protocol question. Andy Seaborne
Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1) Steve Harris
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. July 13, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum
Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1) Gregory Williams

Monday, 12 July 2010

Test cases for delete Matt Perry

Friday, 9 July 2010

Re: Fwd: Re: possible erratum Andy Seaborne
Re: Subquery tests: [was: ACTION-270 completed] Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 8 July 2010

Re: ARQ implementation of LET Lee Feigenbaum
ARQ implementation of LET Andy Seaborne
Fwd: changed FR and UK dial-in numbers for teleconferences Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 7 July 2010

SPARQL WG Minutes - 2010-07-06 Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Subquery tests: [was: ACTION-270 completed] Andy Seaborne
Re: SPARQL Update feature Andy Seaborne
Re: Subquery tests: [was: ACTION-270 completed] Olivier Corby

Tuesday, 6 July 2010

Re: SPARQL Update feature Alexandre Passant
Re: Syntax issues, UNION and MINUS Andy Seaborne
SPARQL Update feature Andy Seaborne
Subquery tests: [was: ACTION-270 completed] Andy Seaborne
ACTION-270 completed Olivier Corby
Re: SPARQL WG agenda - Tuesday, July 6, 2010 Axel Polleres
Re: SPARQL WG agenda - Tuesday, July 6, 2010 Souripriya Das
Re: SPARQL WG agenda - Tuesday, July 6, 2010 Alexandre Passant

Monday, 5 July 2010

Re: 4 MINUS and NOT EXISTS test cases Andy Seaborne
Re: Action-195: Project expression test case Lee Feigenbaum
Re: Action-193: Subquery test case Lee Feigenbaum
SPARQL WG agenda - Tuesday, July 6, 2010 Lee Feigenbaum
Re: LET/assignment Lee Feigenbaum

Thursday, 1 July 2010

soliciting feedback Lee Feigenbaum

Last message date: Thursday, 30 September 2010 22:50:55 UTC