- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:46:08 -0400
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Jul 20, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Axel Polleres wrote: > ... there seems absolutely no way that > > GRAPH <http://www.example/another-named-graph> { ... } > > would be treaded synonuymous to > > GRAPH <http://www.example/named-graph> { ... } > > because the sameAs statement (BTW, in which graph is the sameAs statement contained?) can't affect the GRAPH name... I think we all agree that the owl:sameAs issue isn't an issue. Damian retracted his original comment about this here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jul/0007.html .greg
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2010 15:46:39 UTC