- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:11:33 -0400
- To: Alexandre Passant <Alexandre.Passant@deri.org>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Jul 13, 2010, at 6:19 AM, Alexandre Passant wrote: > Shouldn't sd:name be a DatatypeProperty, and so the name being a literal and not a URI ? (as Sandro said IIRC) > Or maybe that's simply the use of "name" which confuses me (it makes me think of something different than a URI / Identifier, as the usual foaf:name). Right, that's exactly the issue we're discussing. We already refer to named graphs in FROM NAMED clauses by IRI, though... > Note also that the name property is currently not in the SD RDF file [1], but there's a "named" one. Is that a typo ? The namespace document hasn't been updated to reflect the current state of the editor's draft (where it has been changed to sd:name). .greg
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 17:12:02 UTC