- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:07:01 +0100
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Greg's message [1] had comments on federated query (separated out into [2]). I'm not what is the most appropriate way to proceed on the non-editorial comments, e.g. the comment on informal style. [[These do not need to be done this week as they are not roadblock on publication as far as I'm aware but should not be forgotten]] Parametrization vs join semantics for BINDINGs. [3], [4]. isNumeric proposal[5]. Andy [1] federated query comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0422.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0433.html [3] BINDINGs http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0369.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0370.html [5] isNumeric http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0410.html On 26/09/10 01:37, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thanks for all the great reviews. > > On Tuesday, we'll check in with all of the reviewers and editors to see > if we're ready to decide on publication, either with or without pending > changes. > > So if you're a reviewer, please come prepared to state whether or not > you think the document is ready for publication as a not-yet-last-call > Working Draft. If you're an editor, please let me know if the reviews > have brought up any specific issues that need WG time, as it's very easy > for me to miss those when looking over the reviews. > > thanks! > Lee >
Received on Monday, 27 September 2010 21:08:16 UTC