- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:27:25 -0400
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-08-10
* Date of Call: Tuesday August 10, 2010
* Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
* Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
* Dial-In #: +33.4.26.46.79.03 (France)
* Dial-In #: +44.203.318.0479 (UK)
* Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
* IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql
([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
* Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
* Duration: 60 minutes
* Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
* Scribe: Olivier Corby (else Ivan Herman) (Scribe List)
* Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-08-10
[edit] Agenda
* Admin (10min)
o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-08-03
o Next regular meeting: 2010-08-17 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EDT
(scribe: Ivan )
* Complete reviews of open ISSUEs - see mailing list
o (Please speak up if anyone is concerned that it is too
early to close any of these issues, as we're dealing with more recent
issues now.)
o ISSUE-48 - PROPOSED: Resolve ISSUE-48 via current DELETE
WHERE { tempalte } abbreviation as in
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml#t416
o ISSUE-49 - PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-49 based on the current
text in Section 8 at
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/#httpRange-14
o ISSUE-51 - PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-51 based on the current
design of WITH/USING/USING NAMED to specify the RDF dataset for an
Update operation
o ISSUE-52 - ??
o ISSUE-55 - PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-55 based on the use of a
scalar argument SEPARATOR=";" as in
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#aggregates
o ISSUE-56 - PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-56 based on the text at
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/#http-patch
o ISSUE-57 - Remains open, pending my action to send a few
example cases to the list
o ISSUE-58 - Remains open
o ISSUE-59 - Remains open for now
* Document round-ups and substantial reviews
o We'd like to go through our documents and discuss next
publication (one more publication before Last Call?).
o We'd also like to line-up longer term (4-6 weeks), in-depth
reviews of each with an eye towards Last Call.
Lee
Received on Monday, 9 August 2010 14:28:01 UTC