- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:27:25 -0400
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-08-10 * Date of Call: Tuesday August 10, 2010 * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US) * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA) * Dial-In #: +33.4.26.46.79.03 (France) * Dial-In #: +44.203.318.0479 (UK) * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ) * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql]) * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla) * Duration: 60 minutes * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum * Scribe: Olivier Corby (else Ivan Herman) (Scribe List) * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-08-10 [edit] Agenda * Admin (10min) o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-08-03 o Next regular meeting: 2010-08-17 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EDT (scribe: Ivan ) * Complete reviews of open ISSUEs - see mailing list o (Please speak up if anyone is concerned that it is too early to close any of these issues, as we're dealing with more recent issues now.) o ISSUE-48 - PROPOSED: Resolve ISSUE-48 via current DELETE WHERE { tempalte } abbreviation as in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml#t416 o ISSUE-49 - PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-49 based on the current text in Section 8 at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/#httpRange-14 o ISSUE-51 - PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-51 based on the current design of WITH/USING/USING NAMED to specify the RDF dataset for an Update operation o ISSUE-52 - ?? o ISSUE-55 - PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-55 based on the use of a scalar argument SEPARATOR=";" as in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#aggregates o ISSUE-56 - PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-56 based on the text at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/#http-patch o ISSUE-57 - Remains open, pending my action to send a few example cases to the list o ISSUE-58 - Remains open o ISSUE-59 - Remains open for now * Document round-ups and substantial reviews o We'd like to go through our documents and discuss next publication (one more publication before Last Call?). o We'd also like to line-up longer term (4-6 weeks), in-depth reviews of each with an eye towards Last Call. Lee
Received on Monday, 9 August 2010 14:28:01 UTC